An answer:
This 3 stages consist of a unity gain voltage buffer that each have their own C-R high-pass
section:
The signal transfer of each voltage buffer preceded by a CR-high pass is:
An answer:
With the previous answer, the signal transfer function for the 3 cascaded sections is:
An answer:
An answer:
Node .
From the Bode pot for the 3 cascaded stages it follows that for oscillation at a finite non-zero
frequency, the gain of the leftmost (amplifying) stage must be negative. There is just one
(radian) frequency at which ;
hence there is no need to check whether other frequencies would be more favourable for
oscillation.
An answer:
An answer:
The voltage gain of the leftmost gain stage must equal -8. For an opamp in negative feedback configuration then .
An answer:
An answer:
An answer:
An answer:
A is negative, so the combined phase shift of the 5
filters should be -180 degrees. This leads to
An answer:
An answer:
An answer:
An answer:
For the Bode plot, we defined .
An answer:
Using symmetry is the easiest and leads to:
An answer:
A = -8
An answer:
The polar plot of
is shown in blue for positive ;
the light blue curve is for negative frequencies and is required to make it a Nyquist plot.
An answer:
.
An answer:
An answer:
An answer:
An answer:
If
is lower, :
the circuit is stable, there is no oscillation
If is higher, : the circuit becomes unstable
An answer:
4 stages: amplifiers give
of gain at DC. For oscillation, the RC-networks have provide a total phase shift of
(or )
phase shift. Each RC-network individually then has to provide .
The only options are then
(at DC) which is not regarded as oscillation AND
(at )
which is also not regarded as harmonic oscillation.
5 stages: this situation is very similar to 3 stages shift. Hence, for oscillation the 5 RC-networks have to give a total of phase shift.
The total phase shift of the 5 RC-networks is in the range .
The only possibility is then to oscillate at the frequency where the phase shift per RC-network
is
which is possible for a non-zero finite :
5 stages can yield harmonic oscillation.
6 stages: As for 4 stages, amplifiers give gain at DC. The only options are then (=at DC) which is not regarded as oscillation AND . This latter frequency is finite and non-zero BUT the loop-gain of the DC-solution is larger and therefore wins. This 6-stage version cannot oscillate harmonically.
An answer:
yielding:
An answer:
An answer:
An answer:
The loop gain is then:
This has an imaginary numerator and a complex polynomial denominator. Setting the latter to a purely imaginary (complex) number:
Hence it is possible to get harmonic oscillation (out of the box) for this circuit for a specific scalar .
yielding a nasty equation. Full derivation:
Further cleanup/simplication is NOT required.
The loop gain is then:
for oscillation:
yields which is NOT a harmonic oscillator. (e)
These transfer functions should replace their original version in
And it can be derived that also after replacing, the circuit will still not oscillate. Any good proof is OK. This can be done by showing the equating the resulting cannot be accomplished for any non-zero finite (radian) frequency.
IF you swap in multiple stages the circuit may get to oscillate!
An answer:
For these plots, . Asymptotic the .
An answer:
This loopgain has
phase shift at
and has
phase shift at .
Somewhere in the middle, close to ,
the phase shift of the loopgain is .
Using a well selected
the circuit can oscillate harmonically.
This has a real numerator and a complex denominator. If the denominator is real for a specific non-zero and finite then the circuit can oscillate harmonically.
This is obviously possible for the derived loopgain.
Substitute this in the next equation to get the required value of :
This has a real numerator and a complex denominator. If the denominator is real for a specific non-zero and finite then the circuit can oscillate harmonically.
This is obviously possible for the derived loopgain.
This is obviously possible for the derived loopgain.
An answer:
The combined voltage transfers of the four stages is
An answer:
An answer:
To get
with a positive
two solutions follow:
These are not considered as valid frequencies for an harmonic oscillator. Hence: no.
An answer:
To get
with a negative
one solution follows:
this leads to
and .
An answer:
The combined voltage transfers of the four stages is
An answer:
An answer:
No, the only solutions for
is for zero or infinite frequencies. Neither of these is considered to be a valid oscillation
frequency.
An answer:
An answer:
An answer:
The loop gain is
It can be shown mathematically that can be only at . This is not considered as a valid oscillation frequency.
An answer:
An answer:
An answer:
The loop gain is
The denominator is imaginary. If the numerator can be set to an imaginary value for a non-zero finite then this circuit can be dimensioned to oscillate harmonically. Working things out a little leads to:
The circuit can be decomposed into 3 stages that have frequency dependent transfer functions (identified by their gray background in the figure), and one ideal voltage buffer stage with a real valued voltage gain .
An answer:
An answer:
Using the specified R and C and using :
An answer:
The loop gain is . Working on this equation can be done of course. But, the explicit hint — both of them — simplifies a lot.
Using the phases of the three stages, it follows that
It follows that for there are two possibilities to get :
There is no way to get harmonic oscillation at the finite solution because the is higher at and hence the solution at that will win. And that’s not regarded as oscillation.
IF you would calculate the finite
solution, then the answer would follow from having to achieve
phase shift in the 3 stages, resulting in respectively (symmetry!)
,
,
phase shift. That
would then result in .
But, sorry, the
wins...
Using the other hint requires rewriting transfer functions to standard form. The three forms would then be:
And the loop gain would then be: which has an imaginary numerator and a complex denominator. This enables relatively easy solving, leading to the exact same findings as before.
An answer:
The same analyses as for the previous question can be used.
Using the phases of the three stages and including the of , it follows that
It follows that for there is only one possibility to get :
For this solution, the 3 stages combined have to achieve phase shift, resulting in respectively (symmetry!) , , phase shift. That would then result in . then follows from equating
after which can be calculated in a variety of ways. E.g. applying KCL on node gives:
Rewriting into and using that along with yields
An answer:
One of the many correct derivation of
is shown below.
Yielding
An answer:
Assuming the same corner frequencies for the sections,